Auto Tort Reform: A Newfoundland and Labrador Victory for the Injured[PDF] Description: Through the grassroots action of the Coalition Against No Fault, Newfoundland and Labrador is the only Canadian province to substantially preserve the tort rights of people injured in auto accidents, over the insurance company drive for profits.
Cell Phones and Motor Vehicle Accidents[PDF] Description: This seminal article in the New England Journal of Medicine found that the likelihood of a motor vehicle accident with recent cell phone use by drivers increased by four times, and found that the risk was equivalent to blood alcohol at the legal limit.
The Constitutionality of No-Fault Auto Insurance Description: This paper argues that in the event of legislative action, a persuasive case could be made in court that the threshold/no-fault scheme proposed in the Consultation Paper is contrary to s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Chocolate Makers Steal Candy from Babies Description: In this class action the Plaintiffs allege that Cadbury, Mars, Nestle and Hershey conspired to fix and increase the price for chocolate confectionary products sold in Newfoundland and Labrador and elsewhere in Canada. Such acts would be illegal under the Competition Act. The Plaintiffs also allege conspiracy and other civil causes of action on behalf of residents of Newfoundland and Labrador who purchased chocolate products from January 1, 2001 through to the present.
Goose Bay Contamination Class Action Description: In spring 2004, Canada wrote to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador and asked for a moratorium on further agricultural leases in the South Escarpment area of Happy Valley-Goose Bay. This stigmatized the produce of the area, putting an end to farm sales. Tom Angiers approached us to take action on behalf of himself and others in the agricultural area, and in 2007 Canada asked us to include the Main Gate area and the Hamilton River Road area in the class action.
Mass Torts and Class Actions: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff[PDF] Description: Mass torts and class actions have in common a numerosity of victims. The wrongdoer may be one or several. The wrong may be a single event, such as a train wreck, or a creeping wrong, such as a lung disease caused by asbestos or tobacco. Class actions are a legislative response (and after Western Shopping Centres, a judicial response) to the challenge of providing procedural solutions to the problems presented by numerosity of claims.
Newfoundland and Labrador: Class Action Experience[PDF] Description: This paper is prepared for the panel topic “National Update on Class Actions”, part of the Canadian Institute’s 2004 Forum on “Litigating Class Actions”. The paper will give some background on the origins of the Newfoundland and Labrador Class Actions Act, SNL 2001 C-18.1, contrast it with the legislation of other major jurisdictions, review the early jurisprudence, and offer comment on the risk posed by overlapping class actions being launched in multiple jurisdictions – a risk which affected the first Newfoundland case to achieve certification.
Injured Doctor Looks For Help From Supreme Court of Canada[PDF] Description: The Supreme Court of Canada is a great court, but the problem is you can't get there. Only about 1 in 10 civil cases which ask for leave of the Court to be heard on appeal, obtain that leave or permission. The Court decides whether to hear a case based on its priorities for the development of the law, not based on whether the Court of Appeal has committed a terrible mistake or caused a great injustice. The briefs on leave to appeal below were compelling and cried out an injustice that needed to be remedied, but the Court had other priorities.
Public Database of Court Decisions Description: An excellent free public database of court decisions for both lawyers and consumers is contained at www.canlii.ca. It is easy to use and we resort to it frequently, although we also use subscription legal databases to complete our research.
Many people are puzzled by how the Court of Appeal could leave the finding of the Trial Judge intact, that the ditch was deep and dangerous, while ruling that the premises were reasonably safe. It seems to be a logical contradiction, doesn’t it?
General:
Ches Crosbie - A real class act Description: Telegram story published November 24, 2008 about Newfoundland personal injury lawyer Ches Crosbie.
Disorder in the Courts: The Duty of Care after Cooper[PDF] Description: In its 2001 decision in Cooper v. Hobart , the Supreme Court of Canada attempted to clarify and restate the Anns two-stage test for expansion of the duty of care. A confusing and largely conservative wave of lower court decisions has been the unintended result. The outcome of many of these lower court decisions has been the termination of claims of negligent harm without trial.
The Test for Jury Trial in Personal Injury Cases[PDF] Description: Two opposing ideals of excellence in binding civil dispute resolution vie for control in Canada today. One looks to the jury for excellence in fact finding, including assessment of damages. The other looks to professional judges. Both models view fact finding in civil cases as a social construct, influenced by community policies and values.
The Supreme Court of Canada has forged for trial counsel a set of tools for the exclusion of suspect evidence. These tools are yet underemployed and undervalued by trial courts and counsel alike.