Practice Areas
Blog
Auto Accidents and Car Wrecks
- 29 Quick Tips for Handling Your Own Newfoundland and Labrador Personal Injury Car Accident Settlement - Tip #13
- 29 Quick Tips for Handling Your Own Newfoundland and Labrador Personal Injury Car Accident Settlement - Tip #12
Accidents and Injuries
- Guidance, Care and Companionship in Newfoundland and the Thinking Behind Amendment to the Fatal Accidents Act
- How is my Injury Claim affected by a Separation or Divorce?
Medical Malpractice
Class Action Lawsuits
- Can I Be Compensated for Moose Collisions on the Highways of Newfoundland?
- Federal Crown Offers Unequal Treatment to Aboriginals in Newfoundland and Labrador Residential Schools Class Action
General
St Louis Bankruptcy Blog 
Missouri Injury Blog
Personal Injury Attorney News
Personal Injury Attorney News Portal
Personal Injury Lawyer News
Personal Injury Lawyer Report
Personal Injury Lawyer Journal
Personal Injury Questions and Answers
California Injury Blog
Virginia Wrongful Death Blog
California Personal Injury Blog
Halifax Personal Injury Blog
Virginia Car Accident Lawyer Blog
Halifax Sexual Abuse Claims Blog
Halifax Medical Malpractice Blog
View AllNews
- Appeal decision protects some medical information: lawyerPosted on 6/23/2010
- NEWFOUNDLAND COURT GIVES GO AHEAD TO FIVE CLASS ACTIONS RELATED TO RESPosted on 6/8/2010
- Payday Lender Settles Class ActionPosted on 4/7/2010
Library
- Auto Accidents and Car Wrecks
- Accidents and Injuries
- Medical Malpractice
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Money Mart Settlement
- Current Class Actions
- Settled Class Actions
- Breast Cancer Testing Class Action Documents
- Miramichi Pathology Class Action
- Residential Schools Class Action
- Chocolate Price Fixing Class Action Documents
- Video Lottery Terminals Class Action Documents
- Advanced Medical Optics Class Action Documents
- Payday Loans Class Action Documents
- OxyContin Class Action Documents
- Light Cigarettes Class Action Documents
- Lab City Class Action Documents
- Newsletter Archive
- Public Law Library
- General
Class Action Lawsuits
Breast Cancer Testing: How Will the Cameron Report Impact the Class Action?
The members of the Breast Cancer Testing Class Action are seeking significant money damages for their injuries, and would seem to have a lot riding on what the Commissioner says in her report. Or do they?
The Report of the Cameron Inquiry into Hormone Receptor Testing will be released to the government this weekend, and made public on Monday, March 2nd, 2009.
The Cameron Commission Report will likely have an impact on pathology practice and the safety of health care both in Newfoundland and Labrador and worldwide, but whether Eastern Health was negligent and must pay damages to injured breast cancer patients is not an issue with which the Inquiry is directly concerned. The Inquiry will be careful to avoid expressing any opinion on civil damages claims and will avoid applying civil standards such as negligence. But it remains true that the fact findings of an Inquiry can have a powerful influence on the perceptions of parties to civil injury claims as to the strength of their respective cases.
I expect the Commission will do an excellent job of investigating and reporting on the issues of patient safety with which it was charged. And I expect that indirectly, the findings in the report will assist civil damages claimants and not assist the defence of Eastern Health.
But in my view as Class Counsel, the weight of testimony at the Inquiry was so damning to Eastern Health’s conduct, that the civil case on liability and damages would remain strong no matter what the report says. Eastern Health was massively, stupendously negligent, as the evidence at the Inquiry time and again disclosed.
At the hearings, I cross-examined one of the leading world experts on Hormone Receptor Testing, and here’s what he said; so judge for yourself. (Everything the expert said “yes” to, Eastern Health wasn’t doing.)
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Would you say that it’s mandatory to use a negative control?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Would it have been so in 1997?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes, it should have been.
…
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. … The first one, I wrote these out last night, so the first one I have here is that in your view adoption of the 30 percent cutoff in 1997 was ill advised and not reasonable. Is that correct or incorrect?
DR. DABBS:
A. I think based on the information that I have that that antibody that was published in that paper was actually not in use here. If I’m correct in that, then the answer to your question would be correct, I would agree with it.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. And it seems that in 1997 the adoption of the IHC technique was probably not appropriately validated, is that correct?…
A. Yes, I agree with that.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. I believe you told us that IHC is now considered to be a component of general pathological or pathology practice, is that correct?
DR. DABBS:
A. Correct.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. It’s part of your standard armormentarium?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. And has been so since 1997 or even before that?
DR. DABBS:
A. Before that, yes.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. And then you characterized one of the practices of Eastern Health, in particular, the absence of an SOP as a recipe for disaster?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes.
…
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. …But you would expect the pathologists themselves to undertake an investigation if they realized there was a dramatic change in result?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. I also understood that you were of the view that Dr. Ejeckam’s … analysis of the problem in the lab failed to recognize the extent of what you characterized as a global problem?
DR. DABBS:
A. … Yes, I agree, right, I agree.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. I took it that the lab here would have been closed down if inspected during the subject period, 1997 to 2005 to standards prevailing in the United States. Is that a correct understanding?
DR. DABBS:
A. I think that’s a correct statement.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. And when asked about acceptable error rate, your reply was that the lab, your lab is dissatisfied with anything two percent or greater of tests which have to be repeated and then you investigate the problem?
DR. DABBS:
A. Well, just to clarify that, the two percent cutoff is for just repeats in immunohistochemistry. This would be a result of tissues that need to be reprocessed or stains that come back and there’s a part of the tissue that is not there. Usually these relate to tissue processing issues and not to false negatives or false positives. That goes into a whole new realm.
…
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Did you characterize the test failures here in your view as being largely technique failures?
DR. DABBS:
A. To the best of my knowledge, yes.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. You stated, as well, that a negative invasive lobular would provoke deep concern in your institution?
DR. DABBS:
A. That’s correct. And that’s the type of event that I would consider to be a serious or sentinel event, something that needs to be thoroughly investigated because of the rarity of that result. It would be cause for concern to look at the testing, the fixation and how the specimen was handled and how the specimen, in fact, was interpreted.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. And I got an overall sense of validation as something that should be done in house, as it were?
DR. DABBS:
A. Correct.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. And I think you said that variability for this particular test should be no greater than for any other path lab procedure?
DR. DABBS:
A. The variability in ER testing?
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Um-hm.
DR. DABBS:
A. Correct.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Is it mandatory for a lab to have QA when undertaking this kind of testing?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes, it is.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Would that be true in 1997?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes, it would.
CROSBIE, Q.C.:
Q. Is constant optimization mandatory?
DR. DABBS:
A. Yes, it is.
(For a transcript of Dr. Dabbs’ “wake up call” interview with the press after he finished testifying, click here.)
The Cameron Commission Report is likely to have an impact on pathology lab practices and the safety of health care both here and worldwide, but the facts grounding the negligence of Eastern Heath and the liability to pay damages were put on public record of the testimony time and again throughout the hearings.breast cancer civil damages hospital negligence medical malpractice pathology injury
St Louis Bankruptcy Blog
What Is An Attorney Only Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Payment Plan?
Date: 09/03/2010Missouri Injury Blog
Everything You Need To Know About Motorcycle Helmets
Date: 09/03/2010Personal Injury Attorney News
What Car Accidents are Costing You
Date: 09/03/2010Personal Injury Attorney News Portal
Pedestrian Injured in Bus Accident
Date: 09/03/2010Pedestrian Injured in Bus Accident is a post from: Personal Injury Attorney News Portal
Personal Injury Lawyer News
Fullerton Car Accident Injures Three
Date: 09/03/2010Fullerton Car Accident Injures Three is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyers News
Personal Injury Lawyer Report
Pedestrian Injured in San Diego Car Accident
Date: 09/03/2010Pedestrian Injured in San Diego Car Accident is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Report
Personal Injury Lawyer Journal
San Diego Hit-And-Run Collision Injures Pedestrian
Date: 09/03/2010San Diego Hit-And-Run Collision Injures Pedestrian is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal
Personal Injury Questions and Answers
Woman Injured in San Diego Hit-and-Run Car Accident
Date: 09/03/2010California Injury Blog
Motorcycle Accident Causes Major Injuries
Date: 09/04/2010
A motorcyclist sustained serious personal injuries after an accident on the 5 Freeway in Mission Viejo caused by a pallet dropped on the roadway. According to a news report in The Orange County Register, the motorcyclist was northbound on the freeway near Oso Parkway on August 27, 2010, when he struck the debris and crashed. He has been hospitalized with major injuries. California Highway Patrol officials are investigating this incident.
I sympathize with this motorcyclist, who has apparently suffered severe injuries because of someone else's negligence. I pray he recovers quickly and completely from his injuries.
This is a post from BestAttorney.com - BISNAR | CHASE California Personal Injury LawyersVirginia Wrongful Death Blog
video answers most frequently asked question
Date: 09/03/2010Frequently Asked Questions - Virginia Accident Cases
California Personal Injury Blog
Pasadena Hit-and-Run Crash Injures Elderly Pedestrian
Date: 09/03/2010Pasadena Hit-and-Run Crash Injures Elderly Pedestrian is a post from: BestAttorney.com - BISNAR | CHASE California Personal Injury Lawyers
Halifax Personal Injury Blog
Traumatic Brain Injury a "Disease" not an "Event"
Date: 09/02/2010Traumatic Brain Injury Claims
New research published in this months issue of the Journal of Neurotrauma advocates treating traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease process, rather than an isolated event.
As a brain injury lawyer, I wholeheartedly agree with the conclusions reached in the article.
Brain Injury the Beginning of a Process
The authors of the study, Brent E. Masel and Douglas S. DeWitt from the Univesity of Texas Department of Neurology state that:
The purpose of this article is to encourage the classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as the beginning of a chronic disease process, rather than an event or final outcome. Head trauma is the beginning of an ongoing, perhaps lifelong, process that impacts multiple organ systems and may be disease causative and accelerative.
The authors review how a brain injury is often the start of a degenerative process that may cause further injury, even death, months or years after the initial trauma. The conclusions reached by the authors no doubt will be supported by brain injury survivors, their family's and those that advocate for survivors.
Chronic traumatic brain injury disease should be reimbursed and managed on a par with all other chronic diseases. Only then will the individuals with this condition get the medical surveillance, support, and treatment they so richly deserve. Only then will brain-injury research receive the funding it requires. Only then will we be able to truly talk about a cure.
Virginia Car Accident Lawyer Blog
video answers most frequently asked question
Date: 09/03/2010Frequently Asked Questions - Virginia Accident Cases
Halifax Sexual Abuse Claims Blog
Priest Sexual Abuse Class Action Filed in Montreal
Date: 09/02/2010A new class action has been filed in Quebec alleging sexual abuse by priests.
The class action names the Community of the Clerics of St. Viateur in Montreal and the Raymond-Dewar Institute (also known as the Institute for the Deaf and Dumb) as defendants.
The representative plaintiff, Serge D’arcy says he was a victim of sexual abuse by priests while attending the institute between 1967 and 1972. D'arcy states that he was subjected to physical and sexual abuse by priests who were members of the religious group who taught and worked at the Dewar Institute.
I applaud Mr. D'arcy's courage in coming forward on behalf of himself and other victims.
I am pleased to see that class action legislation is being used as a tool to help more victims of childhood abuse. I had the pleasure of being invited to present on this issue at The Canadian Institute's 9th Annual summit on Institutional Liability for Sexual Assault & Abuse.
Ron Martin's sexual abuse class action against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish was a groundbreaking claim. The landmark settlement achieved in that class action will provide accountability, closure, and fair compensation to victims who would never be able to speak publicly about what happened to them.
Halifax Medical Malpractice Blog
Doctor Sues to Silence Patient
Date: 07/28/2010I read blog post today by my colleague Catherine Bertram, a medical malpractice lawyer in Washington D.C. that I thought was interesting.
Dr. Sues Her Patient
She has posted about a California physician, Dr. Kimberley Henry, who has sued one of her own patients who posted a negative review about Dr. Henry online. I wonder if Dr. Henry is opposed to online rating websites generally or just the ones that say bad things about her? Keep in mind that Dr. Henry has signed up for some of these webites and posted her profile.
Gag Orders
Last year I posted about a similar issue Doctors Forcing Patients to Sign Gag Orders .
Catherine's post indicates that some doctors are becoming more aggressive about trying to prevent patients from exercising their right to freedom of expression.
Coming to Canada?
I'm not aware of any similar suits here in Canada, but the online doctor rating sites like Rate MD are a great resource for Canadians. Is it only a matter of time before we start to see doctors suing their own patients?
What do you think? Let me know by posting a comment.
