Phone: (709) 579-4000
Toll Free: (888) 579-3262

I am here because:

Practice Areas

Blog

Auto Accidents and Car Wrecks

Accidents and Injuries

Medical Malpractice

Class Action Lawsuits

General

St Louis Bankruptcy Blog

Missouri Injury Blog

Personal Injury Attorney News

Personal Injury Attorney News Portal

Personal Injury Lawyer News

Personal Injury Lawyer Report

Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

Personal Injury Questions and Answers

California Injury Blog

Virginia Wrongful Death Blog

California Personal Injury Blog

Halifax Personal Injury Blog

Virginia Car Accident Lawyer Blog

Halifax Sexual Abuse Claims Blog

Halifax Medical Malpractice Blog

View All

News

Library

Blog Category:

Accidents and Injuries

2/2/2009
Darlene P. Russell, B.Sc. , LL.B.
Comments (2)

Appeal Court Confirms Plaintiffs Must Beware of Causation

The Court of Appeal has rendered its decision on the appeal of Lane v. Alcock Enterprises  Limited et al., a slip and fall case in which the trial judge dismissed the injured plaintiff’s claim.  The plaintiff slipped and suffered personal injury on a set of wooden steps and alleged negligence arising from the lack of non-slip treading on the wooden steps, and the lack of a handrail.  The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge in dismissing the claim.

I wrote about this case in an earlier blog "Plaintiff's Neglect Causation At Their Peril".


On the issue of whether the absence of non-slip treading constituted negligence, there was conflicting expert evidence on the interpretation of National Building Code requirements, and the evidence of the plaintiff’s expert architect was thought not to be persuasive.  Even if the absence of non-slip treading was a breach of the National Building Code, this was merely evidence of negligence, not proof of it, and it was somewhat unclear what this would have added to the safety of wooden steps.  In any event, the trial judge’s determination that the absence of non-slip treading did not constitute negligence, was reviewable as a finding of mixed fact and law, and no extricable error could be found. 

The trial judge found that the absence of a handrail constituted negligence but its absence was not shown to be a cause of the slip and fall accident and the plaintiff’s personal injuries.  It had not been shown that but for the absence of the handrail, the injuries would have been avoided.  This was a determination of factual causation and again the Court of Appeal was not disposed to interfere.

As I said on a prior occasion, plaintiff’s ignore the issue of causation at their peril.  The prevailing test is the “but for” test, and unless the judge is persuaded that the injuries would not have happened but for the negligence, then the plaintiff will not win.  Plaintiffs beware.



St Louis Bankruptcy Blog

Missouri Injury Blog

Personal Injury Attorney News

    The cost of car accidents in the United States averages out to about $500 a year for each licensed driver in the country in terms of medical care and loss of productivity, according to results of a recent study released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Personal Injury Attorney News Portal

Personal Injury Lawyer News

Personal Injury Lawyer Report

Personal Injury Lawyer Journal

    A pedestrian was seriously injured in a San Diego car accident after he was struck by a vehicle at a street intersection. According to a news report in The San Diego Union-Tribune, the injury collision occurred at the intersection of 19th and Market streets, the morning of September 2, 2010. The driver who hit the pedestrian did not stop at the scene. Police describe the vehicle as a Ford Expedition SUV that was black at the bottom and peach on top. Officials are also looking for the occupants, a Latino man wearing a Chargers jersey and a female passenger in her 20s with curly hair.

    San Diego Hit-And-Run Collision Injures Pedestrian is a post from: Personal Injury Lawyer Journal


Personal Injury Questions and Answers

California Injury Blog

    motorcyclist

    A motorcyclist sustained serious personal injuries after an accident on the 5 Freeway in Mission Viejo caused by a pallet dropped on the roadway. According to a news report in The Orange County Register, the motorcyclist was northbound on the freeway near Oso Parkway on August 27, 2010, when he struck the debris and crashed. He has been hospitalized with major injuries. California Highway Patrol officials are investigating this incident.

    I sympathize with this motorcyclist, who has apparently suffered severe injuries because of someone else's negligence. I pray he recovers quickly and completely from his injuries.

    This is a post from BestAttorney.com - BISNAR | CHASE California Personal Injury Lawyers

Virginia Wrongful Death Blog

California Personal Injury Blog

Halifax Personal Injury Blog

    Traumatic Brain Injury Claims

    New research published in this months issue of the Journal of Neurotrauma advocates treating traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease process, rather than an isolated event.

    As a brain injury lawyer, I wholeheartedly agree with the conclusions reached in the article.

    Brain Injury the Beginning of a Process

    The authors of the study, Brent E. Masel and Douglas S. DeWitt from the Univesity of Texas Department of Neurology state that:

    The purpose of this article is to encourage the classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as the beginning of a chronic disease process, rather than an event or final outcome. Head trauma is the beginning of an ongoing, perhaps lifelong, process that impacts multiple organ systems and may be disease causative and accelerative.

    The authors review how a brain injury is often the start of a degenerative process that may cause further injury, even death, months or years after the initial trauma. The conclusions reached by the authors no doubt will be supported by brain injury survivors, their family's and those that advocate for survivors.

    Chronic traumatic brain injury disease should be reimbursed and managed on a par with all other chronic diseases. Only then will the individuals with this condition get the medical surveillance, support, and treatment they so richly deserve. Only then will brain-injury research receive the funding it requires. Only then will we be able to truly talk about a cure.

Virginia Car Accident Lawyer Blog

Halifax Sexual Abuse Claims Blog

    A new class action has been filed in Quebec alleging sexual abuse by priests.

    The class action names the Community of the Clerics of St. Viateur in Montreal and the Raymond-Dewar Institute (also known as the Institute for the Deaf and Dumb) as defendants.

    The representative plaintiff, Serge D’arcy says he was a victim of sexual abuse by priests while attending the institute between 1967 and 1972. D'arcy states that he was subjected to physical and sexual abuse by priests who were members of the religious group who taught and worked at the Dewar Institute.

    I applaud Mr. D'arcy's courage in coming forward on behalf of himself and other victims.

    I am pleased to see that class action legislation is being used as a tool to help more victims of childhood abuse. I had the pleasure of being invited to present on this issue at The Canadian Institute's 9th Annual summit on Institutional Liability for Sexual Assault & Abuse.

    Ron Martin's sexual abuse class action against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Antigonish was a groundbreaking claim. The landmark settlement achieved in that class action will provide accountability, closure, and fair compensation to victims who would never be able to speak publicly about what happened to them.


Halifax Medical Malpractice Blog

    I read blog post today by my colleague Catherine Bertram, a medical malpractice lawyer in Washington D.C. that I thought was interesting.

    Dr. Sues Her Patient

    She has posted about a California physician, Dr. Kimberley Henry, who has sued one of her own patients who posted a negative review about Dr. Henry online. I wonder if Dr. Henry is opposed to online rating websites generally or just the ones that say bad things about her? Keep in mind that Dr. Henry has signed up for some of these webites and posted her profile.

    Gag Orders

    Last year I posted about a similar issue Doctors Forcing Patients to Sign Gag Orders .

    Catherine's post indicates that some doctors are becoming more aggressive about trying to prevent patients from exercising their right to freedom of expression.

    Coming to Canada?

    I'm not aware of any similar suits here in Canada, but the online doctor rating sites like Rate MD are a great resource for Canadians. Is it only a matter of time before we start to see doctors suing their own patients?

    What do you think? Let me know by posting a comment.


Bookmark and Share


Free Book

Free Consultation

Please complete this short form and a representative of the firm will contact you to discuss it in more detail.

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:


Ches Crosbie Barristers
169 Water Street
St. John's, NL
A1C 1B1
Phone: (709) 579-4000
Fax: (709) 579-9671
Toll Free: (888) 579-3262

Get Directions

Video Library

FAQs

Auto Accidents and Car Wrecks

Accidents and Injuries

Medical Malpractice

Class Action Lawsuits

Newfoundland and Labrador Personal Injury Lawyer

General

View All